Re: Possible bug in int64_t values XDR encoding?

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
1 message Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Possible bug in int64_t values XDR encoding?

Jorge Santos Simón
Yes, declaring int64_t as long long int solves the problem for 32 bits
architectures.

I have submitted a patch.

Thanks



> So I guess that the type int64_t should be a long long int.


>> It's probably an error, and it's definitely possible nobody has ever
>> noticed.  There's only one interface that has any 64-bit ints in a data
>> structure (the health interface,) and even then it looks like that
>> particular structure isn't mapped to any requests or commands anyway.  Does
>> everything look ok in the generated xdr functions?
>>
>> Rich

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Special Offer -- Download ArcSight Logger for FREE!
Finally, a world-class log management solution at an even better
price-free! And you'll get a free "Love Thy Logs" t-shirt when you
download Logger. Secure your free ArcSight Logger TODAY!
http://p.sf.net/sfu/arcsisghtdev2dev
_______________________________________________
Playerstage-developers mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/playerstage-developers